Category:Socioeconomics: Difference between revisions

From Traxel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
To include your page here, tag it with <nowiki>[[Category:Socioeconomics]]</nowiki>.
To include your page here, tag it with <nowiki>[[Category:Socioeconomics]]</nowiki>.
= Category To Be? =
= Category To Be? =
== The Area Between Price and Demand ==
One of my big papers along the way explored integrating the price curve to more closely approximate the demand curve.
Society has become extremely good at that.
It destroys value for the consumer, reducing life to a dreary trudge from one hyperoptimized, minimally satisfying, transaction to the next.
Imagine you were in a transactional relationship. That's bad enough, but now imagine that your partner was really good at always negotiating the break so it was just barely enough for you to stay. Every single time. I imagine there are some people who would gradually become increasingly aggravated at the constant borderline exploitation until they destroyed it all. By which I mean divorce; I'm not trying to paint a metaphor here.
* https://old.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1fiolqk/im_starting_to_hate_games_that_do_this/
== Nothing to Lose ==
== Nothing to Lose ==
"They're looking at the future, and they're seeing that noone needs them anymore. ... We have to make some kind of future that has a place for them in it. Because unless we do, they have literally nothing to lose. It's all already gone." - Fred Johnson, Nemesis Games, ch 42, 12m30s.
"They're looking at the future, and they're seeing that noone needs them anymore. ... We have to make some kind of future that has a place for them in it. Because unless we do, they have literally nothing to lose. It's all already gone." - Fred Johnson, Nemesis Games, ch 42, 12m30s.

Revision as of 11:43, 17 September 2024

To include your page here, tag it with [[Category:Socioeconomics]].

Category To Be?

The Area Between Price and Demand

One of my big papers along the way explored integrating the price curve to more closely approximate the demand curve.

Society has become extremely good at that.

It destroys value for the consumer, reducing life to a dreary trudge from one hyperoptimized, minimally satisfying, transaction to the next.

Imagine you were in a transactional relationship. That's bad enough, but now imagine that your partner was really good at always negotiating the break so it was just barely enough for you to stay. Every single time. I imagine there are some people who would gradually become increasingly aggravated at the constant borderline exploitation until they destroyed it all. By which I mean divorce; I'm not trying to paint a metaphor here.

Nothing to Lose

"They're looking at the future, and they're seeing that noone needs them anymore. ... We have to make some kind of future that has a place for them in it. Because unless we do, they have literally nothing to lose. It's all already gone." - Fred Johnson, Nemesis Games, ch 42, 12m30s.

Popular Media

  • Cultural hegemony: https://old.reddit.com/r/tumblr/comments/179v5ti/happens_often/
    • There is an upside - at least to the progenitor, and perhaps sinister in a larger sense.
    • Is the US-ian upside worth my unwilling knowledge that the Chris Rock / Will Smith / Jada Whatever story is ... actually, let's just end that sentence at "is?".

Leopards Ate My Face

Straw Man

Religion

Wedge / Class Divide

Random

Subcategories

This category has the following 3 subcategories, out of 3 total.

C

O