CypherEthics - Revision history

RobertBushman: /* Bullshit */

2024-02-29T18:24:23Z

Bullshit

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 29 February 2024
Line 20:		Line 20:
	# Reduce confusion to an understandable error in reasoning. Doing so is more forgiving and more palatable to the bullshitter.		# Reduce confusion to an understandable error in reasoning. Doing so is more forgiving and more palatable to the bullshitter.
	# When you find yourself guilty of bullshit, just admit the fault. We all make mistakes. Don't double down on your bullshit.		# When you find yourself guilty of bullshit, just admit the fault. We all make mistakes. Don't double down on your bullshit.
			It often takes only one person to stop the propagation of bullshit.

	= Cashflow =		= Cashflow =

RobertBushman: /* Bullshit */

2024-02-29T18:23:57Z

Bullshit

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 29 February 2024
Line 19:		Line 19:
	# Attack the claim and not the person.		# Attack the claim and not the person.
	# Reduce confusion to an understandable error in reasoning. Doing so is more forgiving and more palatable to the bullshitter.		# Reduce confusion to an understandable error in reasoning. Doing so is more forgiving and more palatable to the bullshitter.
	# When you find yourself guilty of bullshit, just admit the fault. We all make mistakes.		# When you find yourself guilty of bullshit, just admit the fault. We all make mistakes. Don't double down on your bullshit.

	= Cashflow =		= Cashflow =

RobertBushman: /* Discussion Style */

2024-02-29T18:23:42Z

Discussion Style

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 29 February 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:
	= Discussion Style =		= Discussion Style =
	* State facts neutrally, even if you don't feel neutral about the topic. If the objective is to communicate facts, emotion is at best unproductive. Taking a position .		* State facts neutrally, even if you don't feel neutral about the topic. If the objective is to communicate facts, emotion is at best unproductive. Taking a position .
			== Bullshit ==
			John Petrocelli, TEDx: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaOiRRqHNNk
			# Don't call bullshit, unless you're sure it's bullshit.
			# Be considerate. Consider the possibility that you're confused. Try being uncertain and inviting the potential bullshitter to elaborate.
			# Attack the claim and not the person.
			# Reduce confusion to an understandable error in reasoning. Doing so is more forgiving and more palatable to the bullshitter.
			# When you find yourself guilty of bullshit, just admit the fault. We all make mistakes.

	= Cashflow =		= Cashflow =

RobertBushman: /* Principles */

2024-01-01T04:16:32Z

Principles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 1 January 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	** Constructive: No baiting or attacking. Use critique flags to notify moderation systems of destructive content. Do not, yourself, become destructive.		** Constructive: No baiting or attacking. Use critique flags to notify moderation systems of destructive content. Do not, yourself, become destructive.
	** Substantive: Trivial fluff creates the appearance of shallowness.		** Substantive: Trivial fluff creates the appearance of shallowness.
			= Discussion Style =
			* State facts neutrally, even if you don't feel neutral about the topic. If the objective is to communicate facts, emotion is at best unproductive. Taking a position .

			= Cashflow =
			* Consider creating a cryptocurrency.
			** IC retains some amount of currency.
			** Using or holding that currency creates value.
			** IC gradually dilutes its stake by giving currency from its pool as rewards.
			** Think about the DAO model for cashflow. EG: If IC is giving money away, can currency holders vote to give themselves the money?

	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =

RobertBushman: /* Principles */

2023-12-21T14:06:57Z

Principles

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 21 December 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	** https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/		** https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/
	* Opinions are like assholes.		* Opinions are like assholes.
			* Comments should be Reasoned, Constructive, and Substantive
			** Reasoned: Avoid Logical Fallacies
			** Constructive: No baiting or attacking. Use critique flags to notify moderation systems of destructive content. Do not, yourself, become destructive.
			** Substantive: Trivial fluff creates the appearance of shallowness.

	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =

RobertBushman: /* People Aren't Failing */

2023-12-11T19:21:15Z

People Aren't Failing

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 11 December 2023
Line 83:		Line 83:
	** But that's not because the masses are failing.		** But that's not because the masses are failing.
	** They are genuinely trying, and could be succeeding, if the mechanism didn't suck.		** They are genuinely trying, and could be succeeding, if the mechanism didn't suck.
			** Update 2023-12-11: The Likud machine has pretty much won.
	* House Speaker Clown Show		* House Speaker Clown Show
	** /r/conservative - genuine introspection		** /r/conservative - genuine introspection
Line 88:		Line 89:
	*** but often only after an initial period, when a story first drops, before the "party line" has traction, during which they are genuinely contemplative.		*** but often only after an initial period, when a story first drops, before the "party line" has traction, during which they are genuinely contemplative.
	** They are genuinely trying, and could be succeeding, if the mechanism didn't suck.		** They are genuinely trying, and could be succeeding, if the mechanism didn't suck.

	== Systems Are Failing People ==		== Systems Are Failing People ==
	* Upvotes, Downvotes, Anonymity		* Upvotes, Downvotes, Anonymity

RobertBushman: /* Principles */

2023-12-11T19:19:57Z

Principles

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 11 December 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:
	** Rhetorical devices - ad-hominem, belittling,...		** Rhetorical devices - ad-hominem, belittling,...
	** https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/		** https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/
			* Opinions are like assholes.

	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =

RobertBushman: /* Principles */

2023-11-05T14:24:10Z

Principles

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 5 November 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	= Principles =		= Principles =
	* The way to harden your views is not to indulge them but to challenge them.		* The way to harden your views is not to indulge them but to challenge them.
	** Emotional outbursts - anger, vitriol, toxicity~~, criticism, ad-hominem~~, slurs, insults - are self-indulgence.		** Emotional outbursts - anger, vitriol, toxicity, slurs, insults - are self-indulgence.
			* ???
			** Rhetorical devices - ad-hominem, belittling,...
			** https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/

	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =

RobertBushman: /* Principles */

2023-11-05T14:19:02Z

Principles

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 5 November 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	= Principles =		= Principles =
	* The way to harden your views is not to indulge them but to challenge them.		* The way to harden your views is not to indulge them but to challenge them.
			** Emotional outbursts - anger, vitriol, toxicity, criticism, ad-hominem, slurs, insults - are self-indulgence.

	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =
	Social punishment in a cypherpunk society would be much more efficient. The ability to programmatically participate in social movements using publicly available algorithms is potent.		Social punishment in a cypherpunk society would be much more efficient. The ability to programmatically participate in social movements using publicly available algorithms is potent.

RobertBushman at 14:17, 5 November 2023

2023-11-05T14:17:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 5 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Cypherpunk]]		[[Category:Cypherpunk]]
			= Principles =
			* The way to harden your views is not to indulge them but to challenge them.
	= Social Punishment =		= Social Punishment =
	Social punishment in a cypherpunk society would be much more efficient. The ability to programmatically participate in social movements using publicly available algorithms is potent.		Social punishment in a cypherpunk society would be much more efficient. The ability to programmatically participate in social movements using publicly available algorithms is potent.